Search results

I've mentioned it several times, but I'm a Celtics fan because of Brad Stevens. I didn't follow them until he became their coach. I think he is a basketball mind along the lines of Riley and Popovich. He's been successful at every step.

#1 showed up and is a real problem for Dallas #2 the Celtics won the battle 47-43. Figure just breaking even is enough. I was actually surprised at how little Gafford/Lively did and that Kleber got some much time at the 5. He played more minutes than either of the other two.

Celtics defense was so good last night. Tatum was the 2nd least efficient Celtic offensively, but he rebounded and defended well which is what he has to do for them to win. Pritchard was the worst and went 0/7 which is unlikely to happen again. Kyrie wasn't good and the Gafford/Lively combo...

3 things: 1) Porzingis is the 2nd most important player to Boston's title chances. I've said it for months now. 2) Jrue is the difference from prior seasons that could finally get them over the hump. 3) Doris Burke is a national treasure.

I think the Dallas picks are also about 2 things: 1) playoff path - Dallas was tested and Boston wasn't 2) Last 2 years of Boston losing a series they were favored in. That game 7 last year was especially weak and that was the last time Boston was tested in the playoffs.

Almost always once a day, sometimes twice a day so went 8-10. I exercise regularly which always generates a shower plus I shave with a blade almost every day as well and prefer to do so in the shower.

Keep that crap in the girlie thread. This one is for REAL basketball.

I'm cautiously optimistic and give Boston a 57.28% chance of winning the series. Mostly thinking 6 games, but could be in 7.

2 things I think are being under-rated a bit in the various analysis I've seen: 1. How does Dallas guard Boston's offense? A lot of analysis of who guard's Luka, but just as compelling is who does he and Kyrie guard? Both will be a liability 1 on 1 on nearly every possession and if Boston moves...

I made a job change a month ago for better money AND full-time WFH. I never worked from home before except for two weeks when I had COVID in 2020 and when I was iced in for one day. The new company is now entirely WFH only as of the first week I started. They had one guy coming in to the...

And this guy is our Skip Bayless

He's the Stephen A Smith of the FFA now.

Less than 35 hours away.... ⏳

BUT WHO IS ACTUALLY DOING THIS!!!!!! You and Furley keep claiming people are losing their minds when I don't know of anyone that is as worked up as your "counter" arguments claim...hence the "strawman" accusations.

ool

Pretty sure no one actually fits the bill for the 6 bolded statements above. You are debating a non-existent person aka a "strawman" whereby you can proceed to debunk the imaginary arguments this imaginary person is making and then act like you've accomplished something when in reality you are...

I think I've used it twice now? Three times at most. And I keep doing it because you guys keep attacking someone who doesn't exist and then pound your chest like a gorilla.

RIP Furley's Strawmen - we barely knew thee.

What? I see we've entered the "if you don't agree with me that the WNBA is great you must have a small wee-wee" stage of arguments.

Lots of strawmen getting their comeuppance in here.