Discuss if you've got something to say. Laughing it off is not discussion.Check my edit. I said I opened the second and laughed.
Discuss if you've got something to say. Laughing it off is not discussion.Check my edit. I said I opened the second and laughed.
K.This is wild and scary speculation. Citation needed on this non sense.
Found the whole thing.Wonkette has some excerpts:
https://www.wonkette.com/if-we-were-nicer-wed-feel-sorry-for-carter-page
ReactSeems like it's too late now. I'll do it for the next scandal that would cripple any other presidency. Probably easiest if I just set a weekly reminder.
It is and it happens all the time here. It'd be nice if the mods laid out the exact policy for situations like this, because this behavior has a lot to do with making whole stretches of threads useless in terms of discourse.Asking someone to put in time to provide links to supplement their post for your benefit, and then dismissing it in bad faith when they do, seems like dictionary definition trolling to me.
Guys fwiw I updated a prior thread and expanded it to Trump's finances. I will bump it and try to update soon when I can. Hopefully that's a good idea but as always open to suggestions. I think like the Stormy situation it can edge into Russia issues but really it's its own thing.With regard to the title of this thread: the tax fraud story came out a couple weeks ago. Nobody cares. Nobody’s discussing it. Trump breaks the law with impunity and it doesn’t matter at all. In another thread we’ve spent 20 pages since yesterday trying to figure out if Liz Warren is 1/64 Native American or 1/1024.
The tax fraud story should have been its own thread. Throwing it in here was kind of a weird microcosm of what happened nationally. Instead of being treated the way it deserved to be treated (likely would have done massive damage to a normal president and his party in normal times) it's just being thrown in with the rest of the president's scandalous behavior and subsequently discarded.
Rs have been signaling this for some time. Namely when all the Sessions protectors in the Senate suddenly came out and said, "well maybe it would be OK if the Prez changed AGs after the midterms" on the same day.SaintsInDome2006 said:Mueller Ready to Deliver Key Findings in His Trump Probe, Sources Say
>>Special Counsel Robert Mueller is expected to issue findings on core aspects of his Russia probe soon after the November midterm elections as he faces intensifying pressure to produce more indictments or shut down his investigation, according to two U.S. officials.
Specifically, Mueller is close to rendering judgment on two of the most explosive aspects of his inquiry: whether there were clear incidents of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, and whether the president took any actions that constitute obstruction of justice, according to one of the officials, who asked not to be identified speaking about the investigation.<<
Whatever the bottom is, I hope Mueller gets to it. If that's Trump or someone else or nothing at all I don't care but I do want the truth. What has annoyed me is that most of the charges and pleas are tangential. Now maybe this is by Mueller's plan, I don't know. I would at some point like some resolution.No wonder Trump has been so unhinged lately.
Marshall CohenVerified account @MarshallCohen
FollowFollow @MarshallCohen
More
NEW DETAILS: Manafort has visited Mueller’s office nine times (!) in the past month as he cooperates with the ongoing Russia investigation. Mueller’s “quiet period” before the election hasn’t been so quiet after all.
I respectfully disagree. point made with a comment about an article. IMHODiscuss if you've got something to say. Laughing it off is not discussion.
No it doesn't. I would think 2 years plus is adequate. Let's see what he's got.I find the reports that Mueller will rather narrowly report on Russia and Obstruction interesting. I think it’s enormously likely that Mueller has details of criminal conspiracies that are tangentially related, and involve Trump and family. My hope is that in the wake of a report we don’t end up with a new slew of farmed out investigations. If Justice can prove Trump is a turd, then call it out and flush him. It serves no one to have another year in Limbo.
Are you an expert in white collar crime investigations? What reasons do you have to want to arbitrarily end the investigation?I would think 2 years plus is adequate.
Luckily, this isn't up to you. Do we really need to trot out the length of the Hillary investigations for comparison. It gets old having to do this time and time again.No it doesn't. I would think 2 years plus is adequate. Let's see what he's got.
Blaming Trump for a controversial baseball play. This thread has really become the place where you can throw anything against the wall, no matter how utterly insane, and no one disagrees.Everything about Trump America summed up in 1st Inning of Red Sox game. Bubba fan interferes with catch and Altuve is called out. Fan cannot believe it. The catch was interfered with fair and square. How is a Trump supporter to fathom that that’s not a home run, and that those actions deserved a consequence?
Per MLB rules, balls across the fence are not subject to fan interference. Worst call I have ever seen. Total bus####.Everything about Trump America summed up in 1st Inning of Red Sox game. Bubba fan interferes with catch and Altuve is called out. Fan cannot believe it. The catch was interfered with fair and square. How is a Trump supporter to fathom that that’s not a home run, and that those actions deserved a consequence?
Might want to Google “whitewater”No it doesn't. I would think 2 years plus is adequate. Let's see what he's got.
You never give up, for that you deserve credit, I guess.Guy is an absolute tool. Running around having meetings with Russian spies who were overtly trying to use him as a useful idiot. Lo and behold he ends up on Trump's campaign, for what? His stellar credentials? Guy was like a pinball machine for lighting up warning signs. Intelligence was doing its job, and I applaud them. If their job is to look for ducks, and it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like a duck, they are well within their rights to explore whether it's a duck.
I find it hysterical that you're falling for this fig leaf. You don't know what was in the FISA documents, other than the false narrative that the right has already had picked apart that it was politicized. And this is a hill you wish to die on? Okay, go for it.
Again, more conspiracy nonsense.With regard to the title of this thread: the tax fraud story came out a couple weeks ago. Nobody cares. Nobody’s discussing it. Trump breaks the law with impunity and it doesn’t matter at all. In another thread we’ve spent 20 pages since yesterday trying to figure out if Liz Warren is 1/64 Native American or 1/1024.
How long did it take Manafort and Trump's fix'er to be held accountable? What were the circumstances under which they were brought to justice?Again, more conspiracy nonsense.
"Trump breaks the law with impunity"
What law?
If he broke tax laws 10 or 20 or 30 years ago would the IRS have not held him accountable?
Any predictions?SaintsInDome2006 said:Mueller Ready to Deliver Key Findings in His Trump Probe, Sources Say
>>Special Counsel Robert Mueller is expected to issue findings on core aspects of his Russia probe soon after the November midterm elections as he faces intensifying pressure to produce more indictments or shut down his investigation, according to two U.S. officials.
Specifically, Mueller is close to rendering judgment on two of the most explosive aspects of his inquiry: whether there were clear incidents of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, and whether the president took any actions that constitute obstruction of justice, according to one of the officials, who asked not to be identified speaking about the investigation.<<
The most logical post I have read in this thread in a year.Whatever the bottom is, I hope Mueller gets to it. If that's Trump or someone else or nothing at all I don't care but I do want the truth. What has annoyed me is that most of the charges and pleas are tangential. Now maybe this is by Mueller's plan, I don't know. I would at some point like some resolution.
Lawfare's podcast had a guy that thinks the Russia/Trump connection all a giant rabbit hole and Wittes and this dude had a great and civilized debate on it.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-podcast-through-looking-glass-mike-doran-update
Any predictions?
Common sense says Mueller doesn't have #### or he would have released it before the midterms to ensure a Dem takeover of the House. This is your sense, which is anything but common.
Or it would have leaked. How can you say this? Nothing from Mueller and his team has leaked in over 2 years.
I can't think of any strategic reason to wait until after the midterms if he actually had something. Why does there need to be a strategic reason? If anything, removing strategy prevents bias.
Didn't most of Mueller's team already pack their bags and go back to their prior jobs? What's your point here?
If Mueller says no collusion and no obstruction do the people in this thread finally accept reality and move on? I won't like it, but I will accept it. And I'm sure most will feel the same.
The article answers your questions if you take the time to read it.Again, more conspiracy nonsense.
"Trump breaks the law with impunity"
What law?
If he broke tax laws 10 or 20 or 30 years ago would the IRS have not held him accountable?
I wonder how you will react when you find out that you have been completely wrong about everything. Probably never accept it, but you do you.Any predictions?
Common sense says Mueller doesn't have #### or he would have released it before the midterms to ensure a Dem takeover of the House.
Or it would have leaked.
I can't think of any strategic reason to wait until after the midterms if he actually had something.
Didn't most of Mueller's team already pack their bags and go back to their prior jobs?
If Mueller says no collusion and no obstruction do the people in this thread finally accept reality and move on?
- Cnn, Mueller's quiet period has not been very quietPeople around Trump and other witnesses believe more criminal indictments will come from Mueller.
Same way he reacted to his Nazi haircut guy thread?I wonder how you will react when you find out that you have been completely wrong about everything. Probably never accept it, but you do you.
I don't do predictions (not even FF), but I'm always happy to speculate (again also in FF). In short, my guess is 5 persons in the campaign cooperating means they will have been giving information to the OSC and that can't go in a downward vertical direction or result in a null result. That's just not how it ever works. It can either go sideways to other principles 1 degree away from Trump (further closing the seine net) or it can go up to people even closer to Trump or Trump himself.Any predictions?
Common sense says Mueller doesn't have #### or he would have released it before the midterms to ensure a Dem takeover of the House.
Or it would have leaked.
I can't think of any strategic reason to wait until after the midterms if he actually had something.
Didn't most of Mueller's team already pack their bags and go back to their prior jobs?
If Mueller says no collusion and no obstruction do the people in this thread finally accept reality and move on?
Weekly grand jury sure sounds like a nothingburger. My money says something big is coming.
Mueller and Rosenstein are both Republicans, so this doesn't make any sense.Common sense says Mueller doesn't have #### or he would have released it before the midterms to ensure a Dem takeover of the House.
you should really put "common sense" in quotes when using some ###### up definition you came up with all on your own. It helps distinguish your definition from the common every day definition.Common sense says Mueller doesn't have #### or he would have released it before the midterms to ensure a Dem takeover of the House.
Either Mueller is really out to get Stone or he played a more significant role in the conspiracy. Could he be the missing link in the collusion, playing the role of directing Wikileaks when to release the content?
A vest made from real gorilla chest.I'm sure Manafort met with Mueller nine times in the last month to talk clothing. Probably brought his GQ with him.
Ironic isn't the word I would use.dkp993 said:Is it just me does anyone else find it the very definition of ironic that the guy calling “90% of the posts in this thread are just low value conspiracy nonsense” ( @NFL2DF ) is the same guy who found Q credible and kept that thread going for a while after Qanon got purged?
If you expect any consistency from the usual suspects you will be invariably disappointed.dkp993 said:Is it just me does anyone else find it the very definition of ironic that the guy calling “90% of the posts in this thread are just low value conspiracy nonsense” ( @NFL2DF ) is the same guy who found Q credible and kept that thread going for a while after Qanon got purged?
And on the day of the transfer Paul Manafort was made campaign manager.
Just a coincidence, I'm sure.And on the day of the transfer Paul Manafort was made campaign manager.
Hilarious. Gowdy ran the Benghazi hearings. He is supposed to be their bedrock for reading and interpreting classified information first hand. Hell even Jordan will be there. What's the problemo?Manu RajuVerified account @mkraju
Anger among House conservatives for being shut out of Rosenstein meeting next week, which only Goodlatte, Gowdy, Nadler and Jordan will attend in a classified setting. Jordan fumes that it’s “very unacceptable” and Meadows says it will prevent the public from learning the facts
Why doesn't Ecuador just throw his whiny ### out the front door?
Ha I dunno, I can’t figure it out. He is a true PITA. There was also the story from a couple years back where he was spying on *them.Why doesn't Ecuador just throw his whiny ### out the front door?
boots11234 said:RUSSIA!!!!!!!!!!
YUP.She allegedly works for Yevgeny Prigozhin