crackattack
Footballguy
So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
Yeah, and wasn't Gerogia Ground-Zero for the OMG! VOTER SUPPRESSION BOOGEYMAN!™ crowd?So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
Also an election denier too.And to be completely honest. Stacey Abrams shouldn't sniff being elected governor after her deliberate lies about election suppression and the millions lost due to her lies with the MLB all-star game. She's a disgraceful lying individual.Yeah, and wasn't Gerogia Ground-Zero for the OMG! VOTER SUPPRESSION BOOGEYMAN!™ crowd?So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
Yes. But she gets a pass here.Also an election denier too.And to be completely honest. Stacey Abrams shouldn't sniff being elected governor after her deliberate lies about election suppression and the millions lost due to her lies with the MLB all-star game. She's a disgraceful lying individual.Yeah, and wasn't Gerogia Ground-Zero for the OMG! VOTER SUPPRESSION BOOGEYMAN!™ crowd?So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
I forgot - didn't someone start a thread about election deniers being on ballots?
That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
Not to mention the bill that everyone was up in arms over actually made it a lot easier to vote in Georgia than it was before.So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
Agree. It was a chicken little moment for the Democratic party in Georgia. Misinformation and flat out lies.Not to mention the bill that everyone was up in arms over actually made it a lot easier to vote in Georgia than it was before.So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.
You can if you want, knock yourself out. It won't change my reply, because I am not denying Georgia politicians were claiming it or talking about it. I simply said this doesn't disprove anything.Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future.
So record turnout doesn't disprove politicians claims of current voter suppression. Hmm. Never thought of that. Seems counter of their rhetoric, but ok. I'll just agree to disagree here. Enjoy football Saturday and have a great weekendYou can if you want, knock yourself out. It won't change my reply, because I am not denying Georgia politicians were claiming it or talking about it. I simply said this doesn't disprove anything.Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
So record turnout doesn't disprove politicians claims of current voter suppression. Hmm. Never thought of that. Seems counter of their rhetoric, but ok. I'll just agree to disagree here. Enjoy football Saturday and have a great weekendYou can if you want, knock yourself out. It won't change my reply, because I am not denying Georgia politicians were claiming it or talking about it. I simply said this doesn't disprove anything.Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
Just because she says so doesn't make it true. Compare and contrast the current law in Georgia to the prior one and let me know which you'd prefer.So record turnout doesn't disprove politicians claims of current voter suppression. Hmm. Never thought of that. Seems counter of their rhetoric, but ok. I'll just agree to disagree here. Enjoy football Saturday and have a great weekendYou can if you want, knock yourself out. It won't change my reply, because I am not denying Georgia politicians were claiming it or talking about it. I simply said this doesn't disprove anything.Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
LaTosha Brow
@MsLaToshaBrown
Georgia voter turnout does not disprove voter suppression BUT is evidence of ongoing Black organizing over the past 4 yrs. Time and time again Black resilience empowers us to navigate and confront the racism that seeks to marginalize us. #WeWontBlackDown
GDPR Support
www.ajc.com
And racism made its way in via the Twitter poster. So much racism stopping record turnout! Glad she's empowered. We need "bigotry" and probably "misogyny" for a bingo!Just because she says so doesn't make it true. Compare and contrast the current law in Georgia to the prior one and let me know which you'd prefer.So record turnout doesn't disprove politicians claims of current voter suppression. Hmm. Never thought of that. Seems counter of their rhetoric, but ok. I'll just agree to disagree here. Enjoy football Saturday and have a great weekendYou can if you want, knock yourself out. It won't change my reply, because I am not denying Georgia politicians were claiming it or talking about it. I simply said this doesn't disprove anything.Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
LaTosha Brow
@MsLaToshaBrown
Georgia voter turnout does not disprove voter suppression BUT is evidence of ongoing Black organizing over the past 4 yrs. Time and time again Black resilience empowers us to navigate and confront the racism that seeks to marginalize us. #WeWontBlackDown
GDPR Support
www.ajc.com
That's right, because I am assuming their "current" claims about suppression is in the general sense and was based on info from previous elections. Hence, one data point of early high numbers doesn't prove or disprove anything, and I gave a couple scenarios that could explain why that is. More what it proves to me is how partisan some posters are and how quick they are to latch on to the one thing that might make the other team look bad. Proof!!So record turnout doesn't disprove politicians claims of current voter suppression. Hmm. Never thought of that. Seems counter of their rhetoric, but ok. I'll just agree to disagree here. Enjoy football Saturday and have a great weekendYou can if you want, knock yourself out. It won't change my reply, because I am not denying Georgia politicians were claiming it or talking about it. I simply said this doesn't disprove anything.Do i need to quote Georgia politicians and others espousing current voter suppression? I don't have that much time . Purdue plays in about 40 minutes or so.Yes, they are saying that based on what has happened in the past. They aren't predicting the future. It doesn't even matter if there was or wasn't in the past, it's silly to suggest the trend for this current election proves or disproves any of that. What if there was 0 suppression before and now there is still 0? What if them talking about it so much in the last few years put a spotlight on it so that things were fixed enough to allow for turnout. Like I said, odd statement to make and double down on.I didn't get it from Fox. I actually strongly dislike fox news. I linked the local paper of Atlanta. Why would I care about past elections? Dems ran and are running CURRENTLY on election suppression and CURRENT threats to democracy. It's a lie.I'm sure that's what Fox is telling you anyway.That's great to hear. So the Dem message of voter suppression in Georgia was a lie. Glad you agree.Yes, that disproves there is or was voter suppression. That's how these things work.
How about I say I hope both of us are being a little sarcastic here, and you don't actually believe it disproves anything, especially if there was or wasn't suppression or intent in the past.
Not to mention the bill that everyone was up in arms over actually made it a lot easier to vote in Georgia than it was before.So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
Will the mail-in voters get a bottle of water?Not to mention the bill that everyone was up in arms over actually made it a lot easier to vote in Georgia than it was before.So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
Remember, it's now more like "Jim Eagle"So the new law is not Jim Crow 2.0. I'm really confused now.
I just read the statement. Good grief, what do you agree with? LOL!
"This law, like so many others being pursued by Republicans in statehouses across the country is a blatant attack on the Constitution and good conscience. Among the outrageous parts of this new state law, it ends voting hours early so working people can’t cast their vote after their shift is over..."
This is an absolutely false statement. Georgia added voting days to their elections on the weekends. The law actually gives working individuals MORE opportunities to cast their vote. The old law said voting was to occur during "normal business hours" and one Saturday. The new law provides that voting will begin at 9am and end at 5pm but allows for the polls to open and close 2 hours early/late so the effect is the polls will be open from 7am to 7pm. It also expands weekend voting to two Saturdays and two Sundays. So a worker can either vote on the weekends, vote before work or vote after work. Wouldn't the simple solution be to make the election a Federal Holiday so people aren't at work that day?
"It adds rigid restrictions on casting absentee ballots that will effectively deny the right to vote to countless voters..."
He is vague with the "rigid restrictions" to absentee voting. This is taken verbatim from the Georgia Voter Registration Form: "VOTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. Federal law requires you to provide your full GA Drivers License number or GA State issued ID number. If you do not have a GA Drivers License or GA ID you must provide the last 4 digits of your Social Security number. Providing your full Social Security number is optional. Your Social Security number will be kept confidential and may be used for comparison with other state agency databases for voter registration identification purposes. If you do not possess a GA Drivers License or Social Security number please check the appropriate box and a unique identifier will be provided for you." So there are no additional ID requirements to cast an absentee ballot. You simply need what you used when you registered. It also guarantees that ballot boxes be mandated by population and place at secure locations. They shortened the absentee voting period from 49 days to 29 days. Is that burdensome to someone? Is 29 days not enough? I could see an argument for limited ballot boxes, we won't know that effect until it's put into practice.
"And it makes it a crime to provide water to voters while they wait in line – lines Republican officials themselves have created by reducing the number of polling sites across the state, disproportionately in Black neighborhoods."
This is misleading and show a blatant disregard for the actual law. The new law prevents people from providing food and water to people within 150 feet of the polls. This is directly aimed at preventing partisan workers from providing benefits to voters for votes. It instead requires poll workers to now be the ones to provide food and water to people waiting in line or people to bring their own food and water. Total non-issue.
Is that the statement you were referring to?
Thanks Stacy.Not to mention the bill that everyone was up in arms over actually made it a lot easier to vote in Georgia than it was before.So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
If anyone took the time to read the changes in the law it would have been clear that the ultimate result was greater access to polls. In the original thread I argued as much. Instead you got these sound bite politicians with the "Jim Crow 2.0" crap. MLB should play the All-Star game in Atlanta for the next decade as an apology for moving it without understanding the effects.
Thanks Stacy.Not to mention the bill that everyone was up in arms over actually made it a lot easier to vote in Georgia than it was before.So much for voter suppression that we keep hearing about. I guess Democracy is alive and well which is counter to the Democrats message.
If anyone took the time to read the changes in the law it would have been clear that the ultimate result was greater access to polls. In the original thread I argued as much. Instead you got these sound bite politicians with the "Jim Crow 2.0" crap. MLB should play the All-Star game in Atlanta for the next decade as an apology for moving it without understanding the effects.
Hard to make indifference vote.Connecticut has no early voting at all. Seems pretty suppressive compared to the Georgia laws. Rhode Island’s voter ID law sounds pretty suppressive as well. They also require not one but 2 witness signatures when casting an absentee ballot. Must be all those Republicans in their state legislature.
To be fair, your OP was pretty general as well. It's not like you juxtaposed a statement by Biden with that article. "So much for voter suppression we keep hearing about" is a pretty blanket statement, especially since GA is not the only place with murmurs of voter suppression.Remember! When the president of the US of A says this law is Jim Crow 2.0, he's talking about past elections and not predicting what the law will do to future elections . Good stuff today gents.
The title says Georgia in it. I linked the Atlanta journal. Posts 2-4 are talking about Stacey Abrams, MLB pulling the all-star game. I guess I'll be more obvious in the future. Sorry.To be fair, your OP was pretty general as well. It's not like you juxtaposed a statement by Biden with that article. "So much for voter suppression we keep hearing about" is a pretty blanket statement, especially since GA is not the only place with murmurs of voter suppression.Remember! When the president of the US of A says this law is Jim Crow 2.0, he's talking about past elections and not predicting what the law will do to future elections . Good stuff today gents.
I couldn't open the link, and just saw the stats on the numbers turning out at the start of the article. GA not being the only example people give about suppression + your general statements about Democrats + my assumption about the intent of your thead = the series of posts we got. I accept my role in the exchange.The title says Georgia in it. I linked the Atlanta journal. Posts 2-4 are talking about Stacey Abrams, MLB pulling the all-star game. I guess I'll be more obvious in the future. Sorry.To be fair, your OP was pretty general as well. It's not like you juxtaposed a statement by Biden with that article. "So much for voter suppression we keep hearing about" is a pretty blanket statement, especially since GA is not the only place with murmurs of voter suppression.Remember! When the president of the US of A says this law is Jim Crow 2.0, he's talking about past elections and not predicting what the law will do to future elections . Good stuff today gents.
Nope. Current claims were based on the law that went into effect. Or do you think MLB pulled the all star game last year because they felt there was voter suppression in the 2018 and 2016 elections?hat's right, because I am assuming their "current" claims about suppression is in the general sense and was based on info from previous elections. Hence, one data point of early high numbers doesn't prove or disprove anything, and I gave a couple scenarios that could explain why that is.
Terrible news that people are voting. It’s a conspiracy!!That aside - good. The more people voting and participating, the better.
Think I was pretty clear above where I was coming from in my interaction with crack.Nope. Current claims were based on the law that went into effect. Or do you think MLB pulled the all star game last year because they felt there was voter suppression in the 2018 and 2016 elections?hat's right, because I am assuming their "current" claims about suppression is in the general sense and was based on info from previous elections. Hence, one data point of early high numbers doesn't prove or disprove anything, and I gave a couple scenarios that could explain why that is.
Think I was pretty clear above where I was coming from in my interaction with crack.
Think I was pretty clear above where I was coming from in my interaction with crack.Nope. Current claims were based on the law that went into effect. Or do you think MLB pulled the all star game last year because they felt there was voter suppression in the 2018 and 2016 elections?hat's right, because I am assuming their "current" claims about suppression is in the general sense and was based on info from previous elections. Hence, one data point of early high numbers doesn't prove or disprove anything, and I gave a couple scenarios that could explain why that is.
Not if you're invested in the fake OMG!! VOTER SUPPRESSION!!!™ narrative.Just to make sure this is a good thing right?
There‘s an issue, people talk, complain about the issue, the problem is acknowledged and it if it is wrong it gets addressed.Not if you're invested in the fake OMG!! VOTER SUPPRESSION!!!™ narrative.Just to make sure this is a good thing right?
Apparently they STILL have to rag the "leftys" when we all should be pleased with this outcome.Just to make sure this is a good thing right?
Why do you care so much?Apparently they STILL have to rag the "leftys" when we all should be pleased with this outcome.Just to make sure this is a good thing right?
Because i want it to be as easy possible for people to vote.Why do you care so much?Apparently they STILL have to rag the "leftys" when we all should be pleased with this outcome.Just to make sure this is a good thing right?
But why do you care? It doesn't affect you. You have no problem voting for the worst candidates.Because i want it to be as easy possible for people to vote.Why do you care so much?Apparently they STILL have to rag the "leftys" when we all should be pleased with this outcome.Just to make sure this is a good thing right?
VS caring specifically about someone I don't even know and won't even vote for's health condition.
I got one of those from him also for caring about how unsafe cities are.Why do you care so much?Apparently they STILL have to rag the "leftys" when we all should be pleased with this outcome.Just to make sure this is a good thing right?